Spot the Book Community Pariah! Part One In An Ongoing Series About Renay’s Reviewing Self-Esteem

Did you know it’s tough out there for a critic? Yeah, yeah, you’re saying. You dish it out, so sit down, shut up, and take your lumps. I’d like to talk about those lumps at length (extreme lengths, in fact). I’m afraid if I don’t disclaim it will backfire, so quick: I am not looking for pity or sympathy or pats on the back. I walked into this knowing there might be consequences. I want to talk about what I experience as a critic in our community, and wish it for it be so, so, so clear that the majority of my experience is awesome because I have awesome pals that support me, even if we are different. I am super lucky to know the people I do.

Onward!

Let me share with you some of the things that have been said to me in my time criticizing books. I’ve been called a bitch and a bully, a loudmouth and a snob, I’ve been accused of attacking authors personally, as if author bleeds when you say something negative about a book. I’ve been mansplained to (one such riveting story is here) and friends, there is nothing else like it in the world (unless you’re a man and then you’ll have to find something else, sorry). I’ve been told I read the book wrong, that I’ve just misunderstood, I’m just confused, that I’m being too sensitive and overreacting. I’ve been called a condescending, hysterical cunt, been accused of missing the point, been mocked with my own words, chided over being stupid, being too emotional, too angry. I’ve been told I need to be “nice” and “polite” as if those mean anything worthwhile in the type of discussions I have. I’ve been told to watch my tone and that my sarcasm is off-putting. Most of this doesn’t stay public or is in e-mail which I can’t publicize. It happens, though. Not all the time, but it happens.

Now it’s blown up in my face in a way that if I make it private I will look like I am trying to silence people. Recently I reviewed a book and the author asked for my honest opinion. What happened next? Well, he then accused me of being homophobic. I understand, after speaking with people why he accused me of that because of things I left out of my review that should have been explicit. In other words: I believe my review wasn’t thorough enough and therefore easy to misinterpret. I disagree with the assessment of my character. However, as much I disagree, he has a right to say what he wants just like me. His words will stand.

But…I don’t think I’m seeing things, or a homophobe, I don’t think I’m a bully, or hysterical. I know I’m not crazy.

Yet, still, people don’t like what I say sometimes, most times, all the time. People don’t like me.

I have opinions and I share them. Sometimes I might be wrong, but that’s fine. I stopped being afraid of my words and my thoughts awhile back. I stomped the fears that someone—oh no—might disagree with me. I stopped worrying about my words having negative consequences, because if you spend your time worrying about negative consequences, you never get anything done and also you have to buy a lot of Tums. What’s the worse negative consequences can do? I show my ass; I own it, I apologize (not hard to do), I learn (this is important), I move on.

I’m not afraid of being wrong. Wrong is easy, wrong gives me a chance to change myself and learn and grow. It’s being right that’s hard. Being right means I have to face my fears that the culture I live in, the culture that publishes the books I read, is kind of broken and I don’t have enough teaspoons to fix it. Being right means facing that the books I read are filled with the culture crud so subtle no one even notices it anymore, so subtle otherwise smart, intelligent people will defend it and will give it a free pass. That’s hard to face. I do it because I don’t want to become some jerk who doesn’t examine her privilege, especially in my entertainment where I spend the most of my time.

Authors don’t write in a vacuum. Pretending they do is just foolishness.

I am critical of what I read. I am critical of sexism and racism and all the other -isms, I am critical of the patriarchal, racist, sexist society that has given rise to these things and made them normal, I am critical of their propagation when we now know things can be better if we try harder. I am critical of people who view the world through their privilege or refuse to view the world outside their privilege at all. I am critical of these things in myself and others. I am critical of the lack of critical evaluation I see in the world when it’s called out, I’m critical of people who ignore it when it’s waved in their face, the lack of analysis that allows the skeeve to slip by unnoticed, invisible, only to spread slime around another day to another reader.

There are my consequences. Take a good look: cunt, bitch, I hope you get beaten to death, fuck you this book is great, you’re just an idiot, why are you so hateful, you asshole?, stop being so picky, why are you so angry? It would be sad if it wasn’t so damn uncreative. It’s the Internet Fuckwad Theory proven, over and over again. This is my space and I get to say what I want and deal with the aftermath. That’s what owning your opinions is about. I’m not afraid, just sometimes I get frustrated and tired. The higher your expectations, the harder it will be for them to be met and the more critical people will become of you having them set so far up. This is what I see as a book critic and as a cultural critic: name calling, shaming, sexist slurs, derailing. The messy underside of a community few talk about either because they don’t see it because they don’t criticize in the same way or they think people like me are getting what we deserve.

Authors and fans will argue with me and tell me I’m wrong, wrong, wrong in the most offensive language possible and here’s how they’re right and why I am wrong and my reading is wrong, wrong, wrong and as a bonus they rehash all the things in their defense that I just discredited. It’s not a discussion or a dialogue: it’s them panicking that I had an opinion and oh shit it’s long and critical and anyone can see it and fuck, let’s make her change her mind/shame her/accuse her of overreacting/make her feel stupid so she’ll edit that shit out! It’s me repeating myself. It’s an endless loop.

There’s not an active community of cultural critics in the book blog community, although many book bloggers do criticize generally (though I have not yet found one like me). For instance, in the Book Blogger Appreciation Week awards: where was the category for best critic? I’m not calling the awards out at all, they’re totally awesome and I love them. I could have written in best critic myself and suggested some folks, but the absence gave me pause enough that I would have felt suggesting it would open the door to the A-list bloggers telling me that category isn’t needed, it’s not what we’re about, etc., etc. I honestly didn’t want to face being told what I do doesn’t fit in the community.

That I don’t fit in the community.

Who fears criticizing books because of the negative consequences? Who fears criticizing books because your fellow bloggers are going to shun you? Who fears criticizing books because it’s going to hurt the author’s feelings? I admit, I assume there’s more fear over the last one. I fear only one of those (guess which, har), so sometimes, you see, internets, I feel really alone. I feel like: what am I doing here? I am doing what I love, that is, talking about books in the way that pleases me in hopes I will connect with someone that says, “Yes, this!”, but some people don’t love that I love it. They think I should be ashamed of myself. They think I should stop being so angry when in fact I have expressed no anger, simply frustration. There are people out there that will frame this post as angry and therefore wave it off—discredit it.

I am not angry at the people who do these things, send these e-mails, post these comments. I am contemptuous and disappointed.

I am just one critic in a big wide ocean of reviewers but sometimes I feel very alone. Who do I tell these things to, that won’t simply respond with, “Well, Renay, you ASKED FOR IT.” Did I ask for it? I signed no document asking for people to fling verbal abuse or or derail my discussion with shady tactics because I criticized a book they loved, but I put my opinions out there: have to own them! Most of the time, I don’t mind defending my opinions. Other times, I get so damn tired of wasting teaspoons on people who not only won’t listen—they don’t know how to listen. It’s not about learning, or dealing with privilege—it’s about doing their level best to pretend they can’t learn because they’re already smart enough, thanks, and aren’t affected by privilege. I see this so often, internets. Too often. It’s the norm.

The problem is, I expect more than this and I won’t stop because people want to call me names and try to silence, shame and discredit me. The good news is: it will never work.

“All I ever do is try to empty the sea with this teaspoon; all I can do is keep trying to empty the sea with this teaspoon.”Melissa McEwan

14 comments

Wow. Not to pat you on the back, but you are amazing. I could never have the courage to speak (well write) like you do.
And I wish you had mentioned best critic…because well, our little group certainly did a poor job thinking of everything on our own. :) Next year for sure!

For what it’s worth (which is probably not much)….I think what you do has had a lot of value for me. I don’t always comment but you really really make me think. While I can see why some people might think you sound angry, and sometimes I’ve had that knee jerk reaction when reading your posts…they always settle in my brain and get to me. So I’m not going to gush or anything (though I’d like to. ;) I just wanted to say thank you because I don’t think I’ve said it before.

Renay said:

@Amy I was nervous saying anything about BBAW after the backlash you’ve received (grrr), but I thought that since this was all me, it would be okay. It’s my fear and me projecting my doubts onto your project. It has nothing to do with the work you guys have done, which I know is massive because I just hosted a book tournament that kind of crawled toward the finish line with a bum leg and a writing exchange that almost fell to bits—online projects are hard and the more you deal with people and their differences the harder it becomes to think of everything and catch all the balls you’ve put in the air.

I admire all your work and think you sell yourself short because you speak out about what you’re passionate about and make me think and that’s a gift because we all need different perspectives! You are awesome, too, is what I’m trying to say here blah blah blah I talk forever. If I didn’t read your blog and everyone else’s blog I would probably be a frothing mess over here. You guys keep me grounded.

The anger thing bothers me because it’s a derailing tactic, which the post and comments here discuss. Also, I swear I’m not mad. Unless, you know, I am mad and then I say so and EVERYONE KNOWS IT because you can hear me screaming from Arkansas.

Other people have told me recently I make them think but they don’t comment because I seem so smart and intimidating, which. Um. Yeah. That’s fine! Not commenting is okay I am not entitled to any comments. So the fact that I’m even making people think is a win. I’ll take that and put it in my pocket for later when I inevitably get five or six comments on my Twilight review calling me a fat slut Edward will never ever love!

You can see how that might tear me up inside, right? Woe, Edward will never love me. >>

Nymeth said:

Renay, you’re seriously my hero. I can’t tell you how many times your posts have made me go “Yes, this!” in my head. I love what you have to say and the way you say it. Reading you inspires me to ask more questions and demand more of my books – of my world, really. Anyway, like Amy said I’m not going to gush, but I don’t think I’d ever thanked you either, so there.

PS: I can imagine how hard it must be to live without Edward’s love :~( It’s a small comfort, but but but…WE DO. Love you, that is.

Jodie said:

Oh Renay we may not always agree, but you definitely inspire me to sharpen my own critical skills. Yep I take up some issues, but if a book is ok and not clearly a waste of time work created to rob us all of money I do often hear this little voice that tells me to go a bit easy because that book is somebody’s baby. And I’m very focused on gender, but often blind to racial issues – that’s something you’re really helping me with. I aspire to be as brave as you when you write (but I do so often assume I have got it wrong).

So keep going, it’s important work you’re doing at this here blog .

Xiu said:

He didn’t accuse you of being homophobic, he accused you of writing a homophobic review. The difference is pretty important. You, however, accused me of being a rape apologist for making a joke.

ETA from Renay. Once again, please do not engage this person.

Renay said:

@Xiu I will say this once and then I am done with you. Educating people like you once is all I can stomach.

I called you a rape apologist because you used an argument right out of their playbook to mock my valid issues. If you think it’s the first time I’ve seen someone use it, if you think you are creative, you are sorely mistaken. Walks like a duck, says quack quack? If you were an ally, you would know why your comment was completely inappropriate.

Then you come to this entry to claim it was a joke. Are you trying to play anti-feminist bingo? Because you’re doing a great job. Congratulations! By claiming it was a joke, you are framing me as, oh gee, someone who just can’t take one! Why so serious, humorless feminist? If you think this is the first time I’ve heard that, the first time someone has accused me of being wrong because they were joking and why can’t I handle it, where’s my sense of humor, you’re wrong. I’ve heard it a million times.

It is not funny and the fact you don’t know it’s not funny makes me sad for you. Your humor has failed and all you have done by coming here is to prove my points about how people who I am critical of will attempt to silence me and others like me.

I am not discussing Lee Bantle’s comments with you besides to say that I have spoken to people vastly more experienced than you seem to be. Much like I was unclear, so was he. We both failed. His accusations were so false I don’t know where to begin, but I am not wasting my teaspoons on you.

Good day.

Lauren said:

I hear that you’re not looking for pats on the back, but you do kinda deserve one. I like that you have an opinion, and that you post reviews instead of fan posts.

Chris said:

Ok Renay…you’re going to get an earful of confession time Chris. I probably read your blog for about a year before I actually commented. The reason being because I was so damn intimidated by you!! I remember the first time I read your blog I thought to myself “yes!! Yes!!! YES!! She gets it!! And she says it!” Basically, you have the balls to say so many of the things that I think many of us want to say but just don’t :/ And you’ve been such an inspiration to me. I’ve realized that since reading your blog, I have become a little more critical and open with my criticism (despite giving every book I read a 5/5 I swear I’m critical inside my head!!!) I just need people like you Renay to continue to be an inspiration so that I can continue to grow as a critic and a blogger. Don’t ever stop doing what you do Renay! You’re absolutely amazing Renay!! There are always going to be haters for everything. You can’t do anything about them but ignore them. If they didn’t want the drama that they cause, they wouldn’t be here in the first place. Keep doing what you do Renay! We love it and we love you!

Chris said:

Ok…so I hadn’t read all of the other comments before I wrote mine…I gushed a little bit :p And I can only hope that one day you and Edward can live happily ever after Renay…i can only hope….*BARF*

liz said:

Renay,
Your reviews are awesome. They are often quite funny & very conversational. I feel like you’re right next to me, discussing & dishing about a book. I love that feeling. I’ve only just found your blog a few months ago but wanted to say thanks for writing. I’d miss you if you stopped.

Drew said:

As someone who just had a book reviewed by Renay, and someone who read her blog long before I knew that would ever end up being the case, I have to admit, like Chris and others, to being very impressed with her (your) critiques–and let’s get the language right, ok? Reviews are critiques, not criticisms. The flat out worst reviews for any authors are the ones that offer nothing: “It was good,” “It was bad,” “I hated it,” or one of my personal faves of “Don’t make eye contact with this geek of a book.” All of that is just criticism.

Renay, you actually critique books–you read them closely (maybe closer than authors may like, but that’s their issue, not yours). Sure, you offer your opinion, which is what a critique should do, but you also back it with fact–and more often than not, actual flippin’ quotes from the book. You’re one of a handful of bloggers who actually deeply read a book–get in to how it’s put together, it’s use of language, imagery, etc. These are the reviews that have the greatest meaning to authors–and yeah, sometimes they hurt. Oh well. I think authors have a tendency to forget, as Nabokov outlined in his essay “Good Readers and Good Writers” (could be the inverse of that), that reading and writing are collaborative arts. The writer’s job should end when the novel is finished, and if s/he finds him/herself saying afterwards like, J. Alfred Prufrock, “that is not what I meant to say, not what I meant to say at all,” then the author has failed on some levels and probably should have done another rewrite or two.

I have no problem if a good reviewer (keen reader, no agenda, reads like a writer–sound familiar, Renay? :)) takes issue with things in my work, because that reviewer gave me a fair read. Once the book is out of my hands, I can’t own how other people experience it. I can listen to what they say and decide from there to act or not on it.

I’ll take reviewers like you any day over the hundreds of other reviewers that write puff pieces masquerading as reviews that are hardly different than a rewrite of what PW said combined with a description lifted from the jacket copy. My editor wrote the jacket copy, I know he likes the book, I want to know what others think.

Guess that’s just a long way of getting to the fake Latin quote: illegitimi non carborundum. Take pride in the fact that your writing’s so compelling it’s driving people monkey-turd-throwing crazy.

Renay –

When you post something, the electrcial circuits supporting your network must light up like the Rockefeller Center Christmas tree. I live in New York City. And I know that your post on David Inside Out, my response, and the ensuing commentary have been discussed at cocktail parties, around the dinner table, in the work lunchroom, and across the web. This is a tribute to the level of the interchange, the fierce exchange of views and the importance of what is being said on your site. That is your reward. Nothing more and nothing less.
I think you have integrity for posting my comment and for encouraging the discussion which followed. There is a question of whether I think you are a homophobe. I do not. Do I think you would vote for proposition 8? No. I think you are commited to LGBT equality. I think, I hope, you see how frightening it is when the majority can strip from the minority the fundamental right to marriage as they did in California. I think you are commited to the fight for gay and lesbian marriage, which is a core value, a question of who we can love.
I felt that your critique of David Inside Out was a vehement attack on gay boys for acting and feeling like gay boys. I felt that it ignored gay culture and mores. I felt that it condemned us.
The review was fierce. Feeling that intensity, feeling stung as I have so many times in my life because of my sexual orientation, I had to fight back. And I had to fight back with all the intensity that was brought to bear in your critique. You were not clear in your review. I was not clear in my reponse. Your site gives us the opportunity to clarify, go deeper, see where we agree, where we do not.
It was fascinating to me to see the difference in interpretation of the book, and of that fateful three sentence paragraph. The gay men (myself and Bookchic, my gay friends who have hopped on the site) have such a different view from you and the other feminist women who commented. Worlds collide. And now, how do we move forward? Because I feel we are more allies than combatants.
I am glad you are feeling the love from people who are challenged, inspired, forced to go deeper by the content on your site. I count myself among those people. And for now that’s all I have to say.

Lee Bantle

Debi said:

Okay, I know you don’t want the old pat on the back…but tough, I’m standing here giving you a standing ovation!!! You know, you’re right…I’ve never run across another blogger quite like you. But Renay, don’t you realize that’s because your gift is special?!! I hope you realize that there are others out here who applaud what you do, who are inspired by you, who agree with the things you have to say. But like you said, not everyone has your guts. And even more so, not everyone has your gift for writing.

Lahni said:

Oh. My. Goodness. This is the first time I’ve read your blog and I just want to say that I knew there were crazy people out there and I can understand being offended when people don’t like what you write, but come on! I can’t believe you’ve been treated this way. I’m fairly new to the book blogging world and don’t get a lot of traffic but if this is the result, I’m happy to stay small! I don’t know you at all but I’m sure you’re none of those things you’ve been called. You’re just giving an honest opinion!