Review: Geography Club by Brent Hartinger

A group of gay teens decide to get together and form a safe harbor group for themselves. They call it the Geography Club, because honestly, who’s going to be interested in a club about geography, of all things? Geography is boring to the majority of students that would actually hurt them if they knew about the truth behind the club and they feel no one will discover their group as long as they stay low-profile. Nothing could go wrong.

This story is not subtle! It is what it is, but subtle is about as far away from this entire story as can be. The feeling I get from this book is the same I get when I watch movies like The Breakfast Club, which are good for the sentimental value but are actually terrible.

I think we’ve moved past one-dimensional dealings with this issue. Everything about the book just sounds fake to me; the only thing that rings true is that high school sucks big balls. It’s the sort of book that gets the play and the press but when people outside the group praising it for being so groundbreaking pick it up they say, “Are you KIDDING?” This is written like a Lifetime Movie for kids, if the budget was $20 and I’m just so disappointed in the writing and the plotting. I am biased; I except writing to flow, like the pulse of a story, but this mess is…I don’t know what it is, but it hits sour notes over and over again with awkward narrative and terrible dialogue. I just feel like too many characters and too much stuff was piled into a very short book, which means everything got cheated. There were too many balls in the air for them all to be caught. The writing and the story are flat, the characters are one-dimensional, and at the end there’s a pretty bow. I’m embarrassed for this book.

(Also, the Jesus reference? Ugh.)

Teen lives are entirely more ambiguous and layered and this books just yanks all that out and replaces it with what reads like the reflection of a grown adult looking back; it feels very disingenuous.

I don’t like this idea that a book that is written so weakly can garner this much praise from a community just because we’re so starved for some kind of substance or representation. You think I would be used to this as that happens in fandom constantly. Weak writing with a weak plot can be lauded as long as it’s What Fandom Wants at the time. I have a feeling this book came on the scene at a time where books with sympathetic gay characters for teens were hard to find. I get that there was not a lot of literature, but if someone wants to sell me on something being groundbreaking after the fact, they have to work a little harder convincing me that the lazy writing in this book is the best we can do in a genre that is wide open. Perhaps it’s because the genre is wide open that this book is so fantastically mediocre.

I’ll admit I’m too old for this in-your-face lesson. It bugs me because it becomes less of a living story and more a vehicle for the moralizing about tolerance and being true to who you are and that sometimes life is a bitch, but it gets better after high school. This book was talking down to teens in the worst way. It’s an Issue Book and I am not a fan of Issue Books (I wasn’t when I was a teen either; I saw right through them and grew tired of the Infinite Wisdom of The Adult Author). They cheat the depth of life, the thing that good books can mirror. That’s why they’re good books!

I’m glad this is available for kids to pick up, but I’m even more pleased that better authors are moving in to render this title obsolete with stories that are constructed better and pay attention to how teens have real lives outside their sexuality.

Other reviews (did I miss yours?):

None!

Comments Off
 
favorite (and fabulous) novels of 2008

I rounded up my yearly reading here, but decided I should go back and pretend not to be lazy and collect my favorite YA books read in 2008. These weren’t all published in 2008; unfortunately, I scrounge to eat and buy a few books rather than just buying books and starving (ilu broken economy), so there’s a good mix. They’re all special to me and I will hug them close in a metaphorical squeeze forever and ever. If only I could have written the previous sentence with glitter pens and finished it off with a sparkly unicorn sticker. Read the rest of this entry »

 
2009: the year I stop whining and start this effing manuscript. FOR REALS.

I have tons of YA reviews on my LJ and I’ve been slowly reworking them and moving them over here. I’m debating a few, like Eclipse, for fear that if I cross post it the crazy fangirls will find me, somehow locate my address, come to my apartment wearing black Twilight t-shirts with RPattz plastered across the front and misspell me to death while sparkling with very threatening glitter. We’ll see.

The Cybils finalists have been announced. I am not surprised by the nods to The Graveyard Book, Graceling or The Hunger Games (I have 34 reviews of that one saved, so yeah, no shock here), but the others were interesting. I’m just glad The Disreputable History of Frankie Landau-Banks made it; I’m hoping it will go all the way. In the mean time I’m going to spend time writing questionable fanfic for it because E. Lockhart taunted me and then just…just ended the book! AUGH.

I have been “in” the book community since June with a proper journal instead of a very restrictive livejournal. It’s been really nice connecting with other readers who understand the desire to blog about every book possible. Thanks to the seven people following me (according the feedburner) and here’s hoping you don’t all leave when I start sending my link dumps through again, full of reviews reviews reviews.

I did my yearly wrap up over here, which I would cross post but am too lazy for. >.>

 
Review: Deadline, by Chris Crutcher

I do not watch sports. I do not play sports. At work when my team leader jumps into an in-depth conversation with a customer and rambles off statistics and names and bad passes and failed throws I can only boggle when she is surprised that I do not care. I am not crazy about football, or football movies or football television shows, unless you count Varsity Blues, which I was obsessed with because I was a slobbering fangirl.

Wait. I should be honest. The truth is I am bitter at most sports because they become fandoms where grown men can strip and paint themselves pretty rainbow colors while I’m maligned for writing porn about characters I did not create. This is a personal bias: I am inclined to hate all sports on principle just for being mainstream and acceptable things to froth about. Well, guess what, sports fans, I read real person slash about your famous players! TAKE THAT and chew on it. In your face.

To be fair, this story is not about football even though football is a vehicle for the plot to move on, but I think it is important to a) know a little bit about the game and b) be able to handle long sequences of narration about games, plays, and similar events where Ben talks about it at length. The story opens with Ben discovering he has a terminal disease. Instead of choosing treatment for it after learning about his odds, he decides to live out his last year keeping it a secret from everyone, including his family. It’s a story about secrets and shame and choosing to live instead of hiding. I really loved how Crutcher weaved Ben’s story and secret into the secrets of so many other characters. I especially loved Ben’s relationship with Cody. Oh, this story, it doesn’t pull punches.

CHRIS CRUTCHER: ON NOTICE FOR SEXIST TROPE SHENANIGANS

I’m going to pull out the feminist bitching card and file a complaint with the “Old Dudes Obsessed With Making Women As Fucked Up As Possible” department. So many of the back stories were tied up with sex or The Crazy and I can’t figure out if it’s just because Crutcher was lacking in the creativity at the time he wrote it or if he was just obsessed with deviant sexual behavior and considers women unimportant to the story except as stones for men to walk all over in order to highlight how awesome they are. Dallas’s back story tugged at me after I finished. It bothered me that her story was defined by her sexuality that her character was defined by her sexuality. The other two female characters were practically nonentities. One got to be totally fucking crazy! Fucked in the head, literally fucked, fucked socially if certain truths were revealed, fucking ignorant and parroting the lies of the father…well, I give a big fat FAIL to this book for portraying no major female characters that were strong and healthy and smart. My rule is: if an author uses rape as a major characterization tool for a female character, I give them the Sexist Stink-Eye for the next ten books I read that they’ve written. CHRIS CRUTCHER: ON NOTICE FOR SEXIST TROPE SHENANIGANS.

I really am intrigued over how much sexuality played a part in some of these stories as character-defining traits. Crutcher built so much of so many of these characters over their sexual pasts. I suppose it’s because sex is EXCITING! and EDGY! or maybe just realistic because if people aren’t having it they’re thinking about having it.

Meanwhile, this book has, hands down, some of the best narrative I’ve come across all year. It was fabulous and funny and poignant. Ben doesn’t aim for his death in a grim way — he does the exact opposite. Even though he’s so small, he joins the football team with his brother, and lives the first half of the last year of his life as a hero of small town football. I found the conversations he had with Hey-Soos fascinating. There’s several ways to look at them, but I read it as if Ben was sorting these things out with his subconscious in the best way he could. Religion outright took him too close to death — so many people go that route, so he parsed it through Hey-Soos, which was safer and an easier way for him to deal. Spirituality is a funny thing; there’s so many ways to turn it. The religion in the book reminds me of four-dimensional cubes and the way they exist; the waves and the ways in which they move—you never see all the sides.

I was all weepy at the end. Damn sad books. ;_;

  1. Becky’s Book Reviews
  2. bookshelves of doom
  3. Library & Literary Miscellany
  4. Reading and Breathing
  5. Shelf Elf
  6. Teen Book Review
  7. Young Adult Book Reviews
 
Review (or Beastly, Skewering of): Beastly by Alex Flinn

I wanted to like this book. I wanted to read it and love it and embrace in my arms like the beautiful, creative YA spin on the Beauty and the Beast tale it could have been. I wanted to be wowed by awesome narrative and marvel at this tale being so artfully twisted in a contemporary setting. I warned myself that the message might be a little loud considering the market, but I dived in with glee.

That lasted three pages.

I didn’t realize that the book would be so horrific that I would have to compare the failure to my hed is pastede on yay. Oh, because all the heads here and all the application of the Beauty and the Beast story were pastede on, guys. In fact, that might be a compliment. I’m not quite sure they were even pastede on yay. They were possibly just perched, the entire story sitting precariously atop a forced connection with Beauty and the Beast, ready to topple if the book was opened by someone with standards in literature higher than mediocre. Three chapters in I was somewhere between, “I’m so unimpressed!” and “Well, it can’t get much worse.”

I was wrong.

This book was lazy. I can take bad books as they come and let them go, but when I read about a title and get excited because I like retellings and finally get my hands on it and it flat out sucks balls? No thanks.

Why was this story so awful?

This book proclaims to be Beauty and the Beast from the Beast’s perspective. That sounds awesome, right? Enter Kyle Kingsbury, socialite asshole-in-training, who treats people like garbage and subsequently gets owned by a witch for making bad, bad choices and turned into a horrible, wretched Beast. Now, picture the story of Beauty and the Beast, add in a lonely girl with an abusive father and an obsessive teen-boy-turned-monster and a father who hates him, a witch that codes everything that’s happening to the reader, a few ridiculous sounding chats that only make the entire narrative seem even more ridiculous, a really bad attempt to be hip and cool and IN THE NOW, and there’s nothing new here. At all. Characters? One dimensional. Actual creativity involved in applying the Beast tale to this narrative? I suggest negatives, because the story was so tethered to the original tale that it suffered from embarrassing plot decision after embarrassing plot decision, such as the one that brings Kyle’s chance at redemption to him.

That moment in the book made me so mad. Oh, my god. It was like trying to fit an elephant through a mouse hole. I can suspend my disbelief, but this book asked me to take it and throw it off a fucking cliff to the jagged rocks below.

I boggled through the second half of the story, so utterly bemused why any author would make such choices that made the book weaker just to follow a formula. The entire book was phoned in from, damn, Mars. Maybe on Mars it sounded decent and not like a complete and utter train wreck that treats its readers like morons and plies on the pretentious literary ramblings to disguise characterizations so mortifying and a plot so disastrous it makes a 7.4 earthquake look like a Sunday picnic?

I can think of at least three ways this book would have been better; the whole time I read it I kept looking at various parts, like the awkward and embarrassing chats, or the moronic way Linda ends up in his life, or the whole total disregard for setting the retelling in a city that ends up being ignored and utilized in such small, insignificant ways. It seemed such a waste to set a retelling like this in a city and waste the city night life and possible seedy underground.

Also, if the dude was in a pond, how the hell was he on the internet.

To throw the story a bone: all the messages here are geared toward, well, nine year old kids, even though it has “teen issues”. Good moral lessons, really bad plot? It’s possible I could be too old for it, too old and cynical and demanding for the book to work for me. Other people might enjoy it besides the flaws in it that pulse like huge, gaping wounds. I am so disappointed in this title, the writing, the characterization and the forced formula plot. I can live with predictability; you sign up for it with most retellings, but damn, I wish I had spent my time just watching Disney’s Beauty and the Beast; at least then there’s Jerry Orbach to look forward to.

  1. Reading Junky’s Reading Roost
  2. Library & Literary Miscellany
 
Page 20 of 23« First...«1819202122»...Last »